“Reputation is an idle and most false imposition, oft got
without merit and lost without deserving. You have lost no reputation at all,
unless you repute yourself such a loser.” (99) [286-290]
Reputation and
credentials play an immediate role within the story; the first incident we are
exposed to is between Iago, Roderigo, and Brabantio, where Roderigo must draw
upon his knowledge and reputation to get Brabantio to believe his daughter is
gone. Reputation is also discussed beforehand when Iago loses a promotion in
the army to Cassio, who he says is not worthy of the position because of his
lack of experience.
In a time
where status and connections are vital, it is interesting to see if one’s
reputation and merits can overpower their lower status or negative image that
other’s may have of them. Othello, for example, is despised by Brabantio, but
it is Othello’s wartime merits that allow him to be granted mercy by the Duke,
along with the good word Desdemona speaks of Othello.
I wonder
what the discussion of reputation foreshadows in the rest of the story. Is Shakespeare
trying to show that the characters that show proper merits and good reputation
will follow a beneficial/well-fortuned path? Or, is Shakespeare simply speaking
to common themes of the time?
The fact
that Iago speaks against reputation says something about his character, showing
that he is more likely to make conniving decisions; Iago’s character is shown
in how he manipulates many of the people around him (Cassio, Othello, Emilia, etc.)
No comments:
Post a Comment