Upon
reading the first part of Atonement, I
found the characters’ viewpoint of divorce to be quite interesting. Divorce is mentioned
throughout due to Briony’s cousins’ parents being in the process of one, hence
why they have to move in with her. Specifically, on page 54 we witness an upset
Jackson utter, ‘We can’t go home anyway…It’s a divorce!” This is then followed
by a pissed Lola yelling at him, ‘How dare you say that…you will never ever use
that word again. D’you hear me?’ (McEwan 56). It is clear that this divorce affects
all of the children, which is understandable, although it appears to have a
greater effect on them then how divorce affects children today. As a child of
divorce myself, I definitely find it both reasonable and expected to be highly
upset, however, being unable to even hear the word represents how drastically different
the prevalence of divorce is nowadays compared to when this book takes place.
Before our time those who decided to split from their partner would be ostracized
by society, yet now it is almost just expected that one’s parents could potentially
divorce each other. Obviously, kids today also get overcome with sadness upon
hearing the news that their parents are going to split, but it seems as though
the children we are reading about have never even seen a divorced family due to
their wish to completely ignore the fact that it is happening to them. It is
also odd that Lola would be upset about her brother even mentioning the word
because from personal experience divorce seems to usually bring children
together in the modern world. In addition, in today’s society when parents decide
to part ways usually one of the parents simply moves out yet in Atonement the children
are forced to move in with their cousins due to the divorce. This was odd to me
because that is not usually how it goes anymore, and I wonder why this would be
the case in this time period. Obviously, everyone and every family handles
divorce differently, but the ways that we see in this book just don’t seem to
be very existent anymore. So, now I am left with the question: is this because
of the time period or does this family just have the strangest dynamic ever?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Reading Life On Mars was a challenge. i was not really understanding the direction that Tracy K. Smith was trying to make in some of her wr...
-
Act 1 scene 3 lines 377-424 From the very beginning i was pretty confused on what was happening but as the play developed things starte...
-
""Take hold on me, for my particular grief is so floodgate and o'erbearing nature that it engluts and swallows other sorrows ...
-
I've never really read and analyzed poetry before until this. To help get a better understanding and grasp on Tracy K. Smith's writi...
No comments:
Post a Comment